![netbeans lookandfeel netbeans lookandfeel](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ksmhV.jpg)
In fact, I would go so far as to say that I would prefer to be using Linux instead of OS X when working with open source code bases such as Apache httpd.I cannot figure out how to change the LookAndFeel of the application I built on the NetBeans platform framework, can anybody please help? I want to change its look using the TinyLAF java api. And many of those open source projects are autoconf/automake based (for example, version 2 of the Apache httpd project that is part of the OS X “distribution”).Īt this point, given my frustratingly poor experiences with XCode, I would have to say that I would strongly prefer to be using KDevelop over XCode. And many of us want to be able to work with open source projects. Like it or not, many of us switched to OS X (instead of Linux) because OS X is desktop UNIX that actually works. And Netbeans seems to look and feel better on OS X than does Eclipse.Īt any rate, I would prefer that Apple not default to either of the Java IDEs and would prefer instead that Apple put a *lot* more effort into making XCode into an IDE that may be used for managing (and creating) Makefile-based *UNIX* projects. webserver) that Eclipse lacks and has a GUI designer that provides excellent assistance when positioning controls on design surfaces. Version 5 (now at beta 1) has a lot of pre-integrated features (e.g.
![netbeans lookandfeel netbeans lookandfeel](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/thoPMPnBonM/hqdefault.jpg)
Secondly, although Eclipse is indeed a nicely architected piece of code, it does not offer (yet) a GUI designer.Īlthough it pains me to say this, if Apple were going to choose a Java-based IDE, I would prefer that they choose Netbeans. First of all, after failing to get XCode to debug httpd, I attempted to do the same with Eclipse and got the very same failures. With regard to a previous poster’s comment about Eclipse being a good alternative to XCode, I would have to respectfully disagree. After considering every possible (I think) source of user error, I concluded that the problem lies with XCode, not me. When I attempted to debug that simple project, I got the same failures as when I attempted to debug the complex httpd project. To try to figure out what I might have been doing wrong, I created a small Makefile project that consisted only of a project directory, a main.c file, and a Makefile. I believed at first that I was the source of the problems, not XCode. Yet this feature is lost when it is most needed since the editor doesn’t recognize the #include “…” of httpd header files. This is very annoying as the coolest feature of the editor is its ability to jump to symbols and header files. In another particular, when working with the httpd project, XCode’s source editor only recognizes #include and doesn’t recognize #include “…” in the httpd files as being references to header files that should be listed in the upper right hand corner of the editor. I know that the problem isn’t gdb’s as when I use gdb from the command line, all goes well. In particular, when working with the httpd project, XCode seems incapable of correctly communicating breakpoints and the location of httpd source files to gdb during a debugging session. But it seems to be almost completely incapable of managing a Makefile-based project such as Apache httpd. For example, XCode seems capable of handling the job of managing a Cocoa project. XCode, in its current state, seems capable only of working well with a limited variety of project types. I have been *very* disappointed with XCode. Mostly, I’ve been pretty happy with the switch. I recently switched to OS X from Windows. If I was going to do a lot of Cocoa, I’d think long and hard about adapting that to GnuStep’s resource system and modifying Cocoa to ditch Apple’s buggy, closed format. Powerplant Constructor (overall about the best UI tool I’ve used) is supposedly going to be open sourced next month.
![netbeans lookandfeel netbeans lookandfeel](https://www.innerzaurus.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/flatlaf_dark_basic.png)
nib files that suddenly wouldn’t open or load correctly any more.) rc files directly when that abomination refuses to play with IB, I’ve had to completely recreate way too many. My quibble is #4 (IB integration.) I really can’t find anything good to say about IB: it’s simply the worst UI tool I’ve ever used (well, neck and neck with Visual Studio, but I can edit.
NETBEANS LOOKANDFEEL PROFESSIONAL
On the other hand, it had to have helped ruin CW, leaving no commercial, professional quality tools for those who need them. I do have to applaud Apple for giving away usable development tools: brilliant move, will gain them a lot more than charging $495 for MPW did. It doesn’t mean that both aren’t awkward, unstable, crappy development environments, they just have a lot of specialized automation for specific tasks. XCode is good for developing Objective-C apps – pretty much the same way Visual Studio is good for MFC and ATL.